Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
但你说这个故事反转惊艳吗？其实也不至于。只能说剧本挺巧妙的，却还是故弄玄虚的成分更多。
低成本小场景悬疑电影，这类电影很吃剧本，本片剧本有些生硬
严丝合缝，正如Mark Rylance的表演
非常优雅流畅，设计精妙，反转连连，演员张力很棒
告别母亲，再告别法兰西座，匆匆回归就马上又与师父诀别。虽然剧团已经够克制了，但还是难敌大泉洋的演技精湛的催泪自白。恭喜柳乐优弥重回巅峰，后面老年时期恍惚间还真以为是北野武本人。本片表演值得再来一个 影帝 殊荣。
大泉洋和影帝的演技确实不错，感觉片子里对“搞笑”的价值观和北野武几次访谈里表达的十分一致：做最认真的事情别人却觉得好笑；搞笑并不是要努力去“如鱼得水”，而是就要成为“鱼”，不游泳就死了，而不是让人感觉“努力”，那就是有负担的搞笑了。很cool。剧团一人有点厉害了。
❷还有，拉芳丹回去听什么磁带——裁缝指南？
剧本杀电影不只靠剧本，还要靠演技，马克里朗斯成功展现了一个复杂角色的多层次，隐藏在最深处的恨意被层层包裹再随着剧情层层剥开，充分满足了类型的爽感和反转的可信度，国内改编成啥样我都快能猜出来了
卧槽，这老年北野武也太有那味了吧，不愧是影帝（小声）
老裁缝介入自己女店员的卧底计划，清理了自己的黑道客户。开场不错，用裁剪的专业自述开场，这种专业领域的知识铺陈能抓住眼球值得学习，受伤黑道太子二人组来店里避难就开始走下坡路，老裁缝几句话挑逗二人互杀未免太儿戏了，接下来的设计更是灾难：老裁缝可以在杀手不在场的情况下直接把太子尸体展示给老大看并说明真相，结果这张王牌被废弃，反让杀手绑来了女店员导致局势逆转，老裁缝假装支开老大更是昏招——如果女店员招来的敌对黑帮没能杀掉老大呢？老裁缝必然要被老大射杀。最后揭晓一切都是老裁缝的局，这就完全扯淡了，这一晚上发生的事充满了偶然，不可能是其中角色设定出来的。片尾编导还不忘秀花活，硬让杀手不死，再曝出老裁缝过往的黑道身份。这片子看似热闹，其实剧本全是不合逻辑的耍流氓。老裁缝搞到一无所有，可他的动机到底是啥？
前半段腔调很浓，但是最后发现是在计划很有随机性的事情？
他做的套装才是timeless
严丝合缝，正如Mark Rylance的表演
蛮有趣的话剧式电影，非常明显的人物上场再退场以串联故事，但作为悬疑色彩这么重的片子，结局却唐突又情理之外，这太糟糕了。
“I am a cutter.”
封闭空间下的小成本悬疑剧，《套装》凭借张力十足的故事，悬念迭出的结构，演绎出了一场让人酣畅淋漓的江湖风云。未看电影前，我很难想象一场你方唱罢我登场的帮派之争居然能在一间裁缝铺里展开，而更为难得的是电影仅依靠人物间的台词对话，便向观众传递了充沛的剧情信息，并让人沉浸式的融入到了这场螳螂捕蝉，黄雀在后的尔虞我诈里。
喜忧参半。结构很好，甚至舞台剧可以沿用。裁缝的故事总是有很多，他们总是身兼数职，可以是特工、可以是情报员、可以是黑帮。无论潜藏着怎样的城府，也不及那身上的一件西装！创作的很高级，却仍旧感觉意思不大，也许我不喜欢这样的类型吧。看着很累，好似不能错过任何一句台词一般，结束后一回味，就那么回事吧！
每个人心里都有些秘密。
文本太精彩了，丝毫不觉得乏味枯燥！花小钱办大事，赶紧改成话剧吧……
姜还是老的辣，而且还是块很有天赋的老姜！虽然反转和高潮没有太大的惊喜，但是就是很有味道。不像可乐一样刺激，但像咖啡一样让人不眠。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
