Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
如果东映拍外传是为了卖新玩具，我可以理解。那为什么东映会得外传就要写死人的病呢？
太敷衍了，不写悲剧能死吗？高田里穗是越来越好看了
东映你脑袋是进水银了吗？十周年是让你把人给复活了，不是复活一个又送走另外一个，你/@～/：f#b-_“”」&”%
先说结论，巨烂无比！草率至极！令人发指！五十多分钟的剧情讲了个啥？？这种水平也能当变编剧了？？能不能用点心，小时候最喜欢的三蛋居然以这种方式落幕了……两星全给原班人马回归
感觉剧情还不错，但是拍的很赶，很多背景没交代清楚甚至一笔带过，好在还算流畅，原班人马回归而且十年了居然都没怎么变，这实在是很惊喜，和TV版相互对应，中间的哭戏很感人，永恒结婚鸟皮套很帅，TV最后映司的意难平变成了剧场版Ankh的意难平，而Ankh的意难平又变成了我的意难平，对于从10年开始一集一集追的粉丝真的太刀了，东映明明可以拍的更好，但还是有不少遗憾，整体瑕不掩瑜吧，四星，多一星是很感恩ooo还能在10年之后拥有这样一部电影。
不要离去 这是我最想说的。
嗯 主角死了 别人说强制悲剧···怎么说呢 欧兹的起点在哪里 初心在何处 他跟其它骑士有什么不一样 想一想就觉得这结局挺好 愿望这东西 实现了就死日式故事
两年前以为结局在时王，结果时王烂了
刀死了。。
tnnd，节奏巨快，拿着毒鸡汤直接甩给我。虽然有很多经典回忆，但总感觉太刻意了。勉强给个3星，完全是最后的OP给的
辛苦了，火野映司。
我只认同剧场版是另一个平行世界，与TV版无关
四颗星完全给情怀吧
完美的谢幕。我的第一部假面骑士，我最爱的一部假面骑士。
OOO，结束了啊
怎么说呢 欧兹的起点在哪里 初心在何处 他跟其它骑士有什么不一样 想一想就觉得这结局挺好 愿望这东西 实现了就死日式故事
观感如下：
编剧你什么意思？我妈才复活，和我爸见完三面就阴阳两隔了😇三星送给辛苦的秀君和大家。合体皮套还是很美的，只是刚美完两秒就发刀，滚滚滚。
所以希望他复活是你个人的心愿吗火野映司，那你希望的到底是他得到真正的生命、还是一个你们共同存在的明天呀？
虽然能在50周年搞了三个大饼之外还能有精力搞出个这个，本来很惊喜的了，但我看完之后我还是想说我看了个寂寞
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
