Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
应该是我看过的最马力克的非马力克电影了，很美。
《被遗忘的女巫的阴影》，十九世纪马其顿的农村风俗让人联想起果戈里笔下的小俄罗斯和托尔斯泰笔下的大俄罗斯
看前面一半的时候，觉得这个调调正是我讨厌的调调，迷迷蒙蒙的音乐和脱离叙事的慢镜头特写细节，似有似无越大确定情绪目的的旁白，无法欣赏这种，同时还是一个该死的女权性冷淡仇男仇性的片子，可是后半段之后，片子戏剧性和故事性突然出来了，仇男仇性的性冷淡也没有了，好奇怪的片子！
不是说它不好看，但是每一个女性通过各种换皮来实现成长的故事为毛最后都要归结到生孩子。要说《奥兰多》这种是92年拍的也就算了，都30年过去了你们对女性人生的体会还最后落在繁殖上？？？
这个前面看的时候虽然没有get到颜值，但是越看越好看，剧情好。而且我超喜欢他两的眼神，题材也好。
2022-04-23
唯美的画面和肠子，在男权社会中寻找爱与被爱，故事内核是对女性主义的探讨。年度十佳占位。
不明觉困。画面和配乐都凑合，剪辑和剧情过于随性，基本等于一个没什么主题的超长版社会主义旧农村vlog。
“风信子”
现在电影圈，徒弟最多是洪导，其次大概就是艾格斯
大背景和情节还是在线的。罗伯特你个渣男，竟然还真被掰弯，作为警察，不知道自己被跟踪了就算了，还被拍下了。艾瑞克要自由，什么局都赶去，大学教授又如何，形如蝼蚁。尼玛，未婚妻怎么办啊！
寓言+“自然主义”+男导演拍“女性”题材+ elevated horror 一旦发现这四个元素撞到一起最好打起十二分避雷警惕，因为你将面对的很有可能是一个毫无灵魂的超低配版艾格斯。拿这种空洞苍白且满是浪漫幻想的说教去跟马利克相提并论，简直是跟马利克有仇……
能拍到这样也算不错了，毕竟是80年代的视角。前半段80分，后面30分钟60分！
从女人到男人再到孩童，她什么都是，但她又什么都不是，影片通过呈现身份焦虑，通过将镜头聚焦于文明与社会之外的一个不断变换身份的巫女，进而呈现一段在被诅咒的身躯下寻求自身之价值、位置及其存在意义，获得主体性认同的过程。
出乎意料地好看……男一男二好配，好想看后续，这个悬念式结尾啊啊啊
怎么做到把这样一个很有张力的idea拍得那么的网飞廉价感…
年度之一来了，女性主义诗歌，中世纪田园版皮囊之下（雾），配乐太好
年度最佳预定。小女巫一路诗化呢喃，马力克式镜头语言和配乐结合得恰到好处，温柔又残酷。主角的不语和残暴直给的故事设定不由想到金基德。西方版《画皮》进阶版，不仅幻化人形，男女老少、猪狗狼鹰，“我”变成世间万物，维度广度探索的更大了。这部电影最难能可贵的，是虽以父（男）权、女性主义为主引，但已然超越，甚至超越了爱，而归于对被怆害的命运的态度。老女巫被小女巫杀死前流着泪的一问：“为什么你可以轻易做到？”万物自有其含义，这世界令人刺痛、让人恶心，然而“我”曾在草地上尽情玩耍，与“同类”嬉笑欢闹，沐浴阳光下，同河流、同不同的河流、同内心的河流流淌在一起，“我”不愿让它再干涸。为什么“我”就可以做到？“然而…然而…”也许是因为虽随命运指引，还是“选择”去化身万物，更因为“幸运”，终成为自己，而非其他万物。
他也见到了那些身有权利之人与真正的犯罪者相互勾结
3/5 | “做人不能什么都怕，尤其是惧怕自由。”
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
