-
视频
视频
资讯
视频
资讯
Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
和PTA处女作《赌城纵横》一样，几乎没有展现炫酷的赌博技巧的场面，赌博只是背景板。和保罗施拉德一贯的作品风格，创伤过往的主角，自我毁灭与救赎。监狱虐囚部分的夸张鱼眼镜头有意思，但总体完成不如《第一归正会》。奥斯卡伊萨克梳个大背头还是颇有赌神那神韵的。
沉郁的气质，叙事上颇为反类型，但略显不够powerful
和赌博毫无关系，本质上是一种治愈PTSD，虽然那不时出现的叹息与鱼眼镜头下的迷幻营造了一种身不我随的不适感，但还不如去看一遍出租车司机
算是蛮讽刺的故事。复仇和扑克毫无关系，但是也是人生无法像赌博一样算出几率
鱼眼镜头 USA 白桌布 呼吸声 霓虹灯 有些片段克制一点会更好 plus谁看了Oscar Issac不想叫一声daddy呢
太高冷的电影，看不懂。打着算牌的幌子，讲的是一个很晦涩的主题，不是我的菜
how do you forgive yourself… PS值得二刷
虽然我看的很懵,但是这个影像风格实在是太强了
86+ 冷靜克制，深渾雋永。我們總是賭上命運，拼著我們的孤勇做一些自己以爲正確的事。所以泰爾最後放棄了算牌，放棄了秩序和平靜（或許不是真正的平靜），而選擇了終結那骯髒成罪的過去。隔著屏幕的指頭點觸摸，猶如現代的拯救亞當，把整部電影升華成爲震撼人心的神跡。
就，看到最后二三十分钟前其实都还不错，结尾拍的太空了（？就让整部电影显得有点弱智起来……
搞死掉，看完月光骑士再来写这个评论写不出什么了，就这样吧
执着于过去的伤痕，妄想得到救赎，却重复撕开伤疤永远无法向前。
施拉德用赌片，犯罪片和复仇片各自的局部模板讲了一个伊战伤痕的故事，这个点观众确实很容易盖到，但作为代价的就是叙事节奏和情节的张力了，伊萨克的表演很好，鱼眼镜头用的可以，但整体看下来，未免失望
左棍施拉德，面对几乎谈了半辈子的道德至上救赎母题，你还是不明白他为啥选择这么个片情设置，只能从看后的结果回推，算牌这种可以自己掌握大部分确定性，远胜过稍有意外的不确定性，提供了一种康德式把持救赎命运可能性的强控制，硬核的“劝人向善”算是自觉完成救赎，但是，代表未来的孩子，毕竟不是也永远不会是自己可控的属己之物，而总有超出自我的部分，大概就是道德律令般{但做好事、回报以至}的理性神学了，这份终会到来的救赎回报，在结尾，以施拉德自鸣得意、久久停留的《创造亚当》式构图结束，甚至还能看到些女性靠爱情挽救男性的女权意味，真是老旧亦或时髦的主题都雨露均沾了，学院应该有所表示。
牌场较量很有趣又出彩。
高开低走，因为配乐和奥斯卡的脸值得一看。三星给鱼眼镜头的噩梦部分，男主角阴影下的脸太迷人了，配乐也可以。爱情线尬到我脚趾抠出巨型陨石坑。而且也没看出算牌和主线有什么联系，其实不算牌，是个谨慎的小偷或者抢劫犯故事都不会受到影响啊！我不理解。
几乎所有喜欢的镜头都剪在预告片里了。taxi driver的味道吗？有那么一点，不足以支撑我喜欢这部电影。
是不是有点类似
oh daddy!太辣了，辣到让我无视神叨叨的台词和摸不着脑的情节
搞死掉，看完月光骑士再来写这个评论写不出什么了，就这样吧
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
