A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
口味算是略重，反倒是贯穿全片主线警察的故事最无趣。
还原94的复古感上第一个故事最到位，喜欢女主持最后笑着赞颂邪神及随后搅拌机广告传达的恶趣味；提莫的作品依旧是最生猛的那个，但是画面过于高清放在94题材有点不适应，枪火特效一出来把我乐坏了（CS1.6做得都比你真；第二个守灵闹鬼的故事是平庸的命题作文；第四个烂得令人发指，可看程度大概还不如克林顿在椭圆形办公室留下的那团污渍。
都市传说系列作品，这是系列的第四部，因为模仿94年的纪录片，以及94年的科技水平叫了94.整体番茄酱充足，印尼部分比较超现实。也就猎奇的镜头拉高一定的观看感觉。
但没人愿意看这些啊…
有些许江郎才尽的势头，稍显失望，大招全放前面了，后面越来越不行，应该反过来，这样观感能好很多，这种很有年代的影像质感倒是增添了很多粗砺的恐怖感，以及印尼的故事依旧不错。
四个平庸的短篇凑齐来还算不错。《真·鬼影实录》＞《下水道的美人鼠》＞《自爆吸血鬼》＞《赛博疯子的诞生》 其实还是第三部的《平行世界》最cult。（2022.4.27豆瓣6.3分）
和3差不多质量，只有一个段落是好的（守灵），其他都不大行，印尼那个感觉过于自嗨到完全格格不入了
美式恐怖是激进的邪教，印尼恐怖是变成怪人不被社会接受，中国恐怖是……反正也没人拍，算了不说了，这一部劣质录像带感减少了很多，演员台词太过关、构图太专业、剪辑节奏太恰好，大大降低了故事的恐怖程度
风格回归了该系列的最初两部,并在其中一个故事中加入了科幻朋克元素,虽然串联的主体片段依然过散,好在其他片段保持了基本的水平线.
2.5。相当于结合了第二部和第三部的优势，却失去了大体上的灵光创意。机械改造那一段观感尚佳，绝对能满足血浆爱好者。
及格了。故事124都比较简单，但是画质还都对味儿。故事3过于高清，过于依赖电脑特效，连枪火效果都是电脑做的，显得特别廉价，但是还算爽快，有日本cult的风格。
致命录像带系列永远不会让人失望～这次的主题是vhs录像机主题，好复古的感觉，最喜欢第二个，配乐气氛都好棒，一个人和尸体在风雨交加的灵堂～简单又极其巧妙的小品恐怖故事，然后就是第一个故事，中间穿插的压碎机广告太有趣了，local58的感觉，然后就是第三个，好像豚鼠系列，可是没有复古的质感，第四个无聊，串联故事场景还不错啦。
还是可以的，看改造人的那一段的时候正在吃一个烧得比较烂的锔饭，差点吃不下去
剧情：6
下水道鼠人怪、殡仪馆复活的被肢解的尸体、实验室机器合成人，还有最后一个雪地里的故事不懂什么意思。挺CULT, 够暴力, 机器合成人那里恶心了一下。永远不要给机器人活着的机会！！
还不错，制作痕迹很重，不像之前那种纯原生感，竟然还有转场，故事的口味还可以，除了恐怖分子那个有点墨迹，剩下的都该好，最好的是人体实验那个了，
比前几部多了一份粗粝与最原始的血腥本色，但故事也相对变得更加支离破碎。
那个说“什么年代了随便拿个手机拍都比这画质好”的短评太好笑了
第三个故事风格更接近爱死亡机器人的气质，也有一种第一视角射击类剧情游戏的感觉！其他就没有什么灵光乍现！
重口味爱好者的必看电影，比前三部略微逊色了点，只有第一个故事和第三个故事稍微有些看点
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
