Ten years ago, Ginny (Toni Gonzaga), an Architecture student, and Marco (Piolo Pascual), a History professor, began a one-of-a-kind and unpredictable love story. In the five years that they were together, they brought out the best in each other, which included Marco's unrealized dream of becoming a chef. Together, they worked towards their dream of opening up a restaurant, but when Ginny realized her own pursuits were different from his, she rejected his wedding proposal and left the country for a Masters degree in Architecture. At present, Ginny co-owns a one-stop Architecture and Interior Design firm specializing in Restoration. She receives an email from Marco, which was written and sent after their break-up, meant to be read four years later. It makes her feel even more regretful of leaving the love of her life. When their firm receives an offer to restore an old house into a restaurant, she is ecstatic to learn that Marco will be co-owning the restaurant. She takes this as a sign...
没有人会比钱老板的美国白男形象更典型了的吧？演了很多遍的退伍人狗的故事
很治愈很温暖，可能生活太多苦，已经无法看狗血剧情，对这种治愈系很喜欢。温暖。
看过丹麦版再来看这个的话，实在没啥亮点。男主对角色的诠释稍微不同点，其他细微改动其实也就那样了。评分的对比说明了问题。
毫无亮点的公路片，动物题材也没什么加分，也一点也不好笑。
其实我自己看的时候倒是挺喜欢的
Love me,正相反，我并不喜欢一切都必须得是深刻的。
打发时间聊胜于无吧
就是太熟套，狗故事太多。要不是查宁·塔图姆都不会看，以为首导会拍出新意，其实没有，杂乱无章，还有点无聊。5
一颗给豆腐，一颗给你白，一颗给七一，一颗给miumiu，电影给-2颗，拍的是个啥玩意？
每一只狗活着，都是为了生存或者帮助人类；有些人活着，纯粹是在浪费粮食
The Guilty本身执行得还算比较成功，Antoine Fuqua的节奏控制能力以及Jake Gyllenhaal的实力还是能够让美版有足够吸引人的点，但也仅限于没看过原版的观众，而珠玉在前，剧本和电影形式本身其实并不适合进行翻拍。
相互治愈真的太棒了
有几幕还是很恐惧的
成本也太低了，一个人对着一部电话撑完了整片
狗狗来到主人葬礼上直接睡到主人鞋子那幕很感动
套路但依然温暖 看的时候满脑子都是自家狗子 能彼此选择 爱与被爱 我们都好幸福🥺
看不太进去……制作水平中下，可能只有美国军人才能打高分吧。5.5
太过于老套路，但是女主最后一秒反杀很绝，三星都给这一段
实话说男主太不适合角色，没看出对狗的一点爱，也没表现出浪荡货的贱样，猛男形象这片子里不需要。
因为他袒露了他的vulnerability，那么露露也愿意放下防御，这是信任
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
