Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
炒冷饭炒得这么烂，以至于我在电影院如坐针毡度秒如年，导演现在是啥审美啊，造型一言难尽……尼奥终于发出气功的那一瞬间，电影院回荡着我不可置信的笑声……
爱不仅可以发电，还可以发功。蓝发女孩好飒！
基努怎么一点也没变！故事越来越复杂！经典！
8/10前半部分让观众都陷入其中，相比之下后半部分剧情太弱了。如果没有第三部，这一部最好的结局就是在跳下楼顶，再也没飞起来，这才是自由之路。
由《超感猎杀》原班最强阵容打酱油，也是有生之年了。
看在老粉的面上勉强三星吧，定位就很奇怪，靠几个闪回和原班人马回归拉拢老粉，但剧情基本零进展，华纳忘了当年这个系列风靡全球靠的是最新潮的概念和叙事啊，如果是要发展新观众，那倒是学学星战新三部曲搞个新英雄出来啊，看着两个中年人在天台亲亲你跳我也跳，这续集真的能拍的下去？
很多情怀老梗看得既暖心又风趣，但是打斗、枪战、追车都设计得很偷懒，除了蠕虫、僵尸网络、肉鸡这些当年还不流行的概念得到了视觉化呈现之外，影片在试图扩大世界观上的努力算是以失败告终。。。我就一直猜这一次会怎么隐喻性转身份认同设定，万万没想到是以男女手牵手飞向夕阳那么俗的方式，宣告 The One，其实是半男半女哟。唉，槽点过多一言难尽，总之当成续作来看还是挺失望的，但是当成重温三部曲的引子，倒是还行。
一碗令我反胃的冷饭。三部曲就是个可笑的游戏！？滚动播放三部曲的片段！？要点脸吧！
沃卓斯基这辈子最成功的是拍了黑客帝国，最失败的是重启了黑客帝国。
Free your body, free your mind, just free!
Trinity的觉醒教育我们，女性要打破沉重的婚姻家庭枷锁，抛弃见鬼的老公孩子，摆脱贤妻良母的身份标签，放开手脚追寻真自我后，才能自由翱翔。。。当然现实里无论男人女人，绝大部分人还是被困在程序里混吃等死进行式，Trinity跟朋友说，我是不是很像她，然后被哈哈大笑时，我也挺想笑的，白日梦谁都会做，电影只是电影。
眼看他起高楼，眼看他楼塌了。。。乘兴而来，败兴而归。
看了三分之一，弃了……这不就是把老版硬生生重来了一遍吗 -_-
how dare lana wochowski did the action coordinator job herself!!!!!!!!!!!! how!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 全片打斗声音和动作配不上，动作和动作也配不上！！！！剧本本身也不算差吧，剧情台词都在点子上，，毕竟沃卓斯基写剧本搞哲学思辨的水平还是可以的，而且黑客帝国，自由意志之类的概念完全不过时。但是整体的效果真的不太对，尤其是过多的插入了前三部的回放，（再加上过于自嘲的台词）不知道的人以为你拍纪录片将如何搞砸黑客帝国重启呢！！！想要拉拢老粉也要讲究基本法啊！！！不看抓心挠肝，看了后会，我宁愿这部片子没拍过。
作为粉丝向作品处处强行怀旧，但还是感觉被喂了屎一样如鲠在喉。最近的院线电影真让人怀疑影迷兜里的钱是不是大风刮来的（对，说的就是spiderman，kingsman和本作）
如果没记错，第一次用快进的方式“膜拜”一个曾经辉煌无比的大IP的重启。剧本的拙劣难以下咽，它就像一只黑带十段的瞌睡虫，屡屡在你强打精神的时候，就往你眼皮上狠狠地扎一道。很难想象，一个如今年届六十曾几何时叱咤矩阵的育龄男，可以跟一群九零后后程序狗围炉讨论如何写一个新游戏这么中二。除了屡屡消费前三作的所谓经典时刻和堆积所谓致敬彩蛋，故事不出彩、剪辑很差劲、动作不凌厉，可谓一无是处。沃卓斯基姐姐，您老这是怎么了？
後駭客任務的角度去玩轉魔術方塊，真的很挑戰影迷，算是一種奇巧，但也正因為如此，認為是作弊而給差評是能理解，但至少我是覺得有趣的
信，不信——
三颗星分别给黑客帝国1、2、3
还好留存了一份自嘲与解构，这一部分值两颗星，其余皆为灾难。拉娜到底为什么拍这部片子，背后又发生了什么呢？解释不清，唯有彩蛋里的那句话可以做脚注了——电影已死，电影已死，重复两遍。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
