Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
今年呢。
アップリンク吉祥寺 ほろ苦いラブストーリー。被刺痛的人真的会很痛、像是那种后劲很大的中药、慢慢的苦味泛上来、不知不觉地就叫人淌下泪来。私心借这部电影告别自己的高円寺ラブストーリー、特地选了平日的晚场。电影最后十分钟、发现坐旁边同样一人来看深夜场的姐姐哭的更惨。
倒叙意义是啥啊？还要去琢磨情节。以感情为引导多拍点小叶沙哑的声音两个人跳舞的街头少点设计感吧
前面平淡到有啲悶到眼瞓，後來二人偷入水族館開始先好啲。硬要比都係花束更勝一籌，雖然both非我杯茶
我承认出现了比花束更好的爱情电影，也许第一次的时候我是看着花束流泪，可是这次我清楚的记得是那些细节拼凑起了爱情。
要是真的能明天就好了。
情侣间温馨平淡琐碎的日常 伊藤莎莉和池松壮亮用细腻贴地的演技给这个故事增色不少 片中几次女主的泪点都和我的泪点重叠 会让人不自觉的跟着笑跟着哭让人共情 这才是爱情片应该有的样子
---
“爱情是不存在的，存在的只是爱情的证据。”
如果说恋爱大多爱而不得的结果无法改变
可以确定的是高于滨口龙介执导片单的平均线，高于《驾驶我的车》《夜以继日》，跟《偶然与想象》《激情》持平，对爱情失败的追究亦有刨根问底的切切的决心。最终分手的导火索极具代表性，是那一类有关“不说出来怎么传达真实的想法”的分歧。野原叶认为内心有什么想说的话，一定要明明白白说出口，希望全世界人类都使用同一种语言，以免沟通不畅；照生则认为言语没办法准确传达内心所想，两个人不说一句话，同样会明白彼此心意相通，而言语徒增错讹与繁琐。7月26日0点像是一道符咒，彼此自行启动记忆开关、追溯爱情的来龙去脉，而最甜的记忆则化为利刃，一刀复一刀剜不掉心头旧肉，亦长不出新肉。她躺在他身边，说很想他，他说，“不如我们在梦里相会，在三丁目的某处”。拥有过真爱的人不免唏嘘，原来大家在爱情中的占有欲如此相似。
都是那些说不清道不明的东西吧
最后分开了有了家庭还是想着买个蛋糕
@ユナイテッドシネマ 怪我抱了太高期望 看完就差拍桌子大叫金返せ了 （但是时隔七年 终于get到了伊藤沙莉的克里斯马
它的2.0倒叙版#稍微想起一些；
7分。
結局還是有挽回一點分數的，我本來是猜兩人最後還是裹足不前。沒想到葉醬早就展開新一頁了，只剩下照生一個留在原地。
回忆要是回想的话，的确只能稍微想起一些。倒叙也是某种程度上的回忆，回忆也大概只能稍微想起一些美好的记忆。
4.2。日版细腻升级的《一天》。”回忆只剩下局部，就算再和你倒带人生“，回忆溯游而上，分离后的不期而遇到初遇时小巷共舞，从泛苦的底味里慢慢晕出甜，却在悲伤里越浸越深，而那个精神失常的说着在未来等着亡妻的人在倒退中重遇爱人，又暗喻着倒放也是一种向未来的前进。情感尺度拿捏地太好，车内对话时的光线流动与眼神流转、水族馆里情欲流动的深邃的蓝、舞蹈的勾连回忆和遐想温柔短暂如烟花绽放，最后看见车牌双方不言而喻的不打扰的克制的隐忍并迎来同一片朝阳。过分细腻和催泪。”当时只道是寻常“。
7分。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
