Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
还是太刻板了 不如男生贾里女生贾梅那种可爱 质感也不太行
不过，还是选择4星
魯西西長在了我的審美上，故事也挺感人的，雖然跟原著不太一樣，但～依然是個好故事。
非理性打分！无条件支持皮皮鲁与鲁西西。已经忘记原著细节了，编剧肯定做了大量改动，不过底色还在。
其实 就是一部带点恐怖意义的家庭教育片，无非就是象征着教育失败的血和泪水会在小孩心中孵化出另一个孩子，然而母亲的生活实在是，出差就是与另一位性格的男友 啊啊啊啊啊，还带女儿过去？我一度怀疑是母女片场了。唉
更应该认为是一个复仇故事，“你夺走了我的母亲，我夺走你的女儿”。小女孩的母亲是现代社会典型的表演型人格，社交媒体上呈现的是最完美的一面，跟丈夫和和气气、一对儿女漂漂亮亮，有一座带花园的院子，枝形吊灯、沙发套和地毯交汇出一片温柔的色调，直到一只误闯的乌鸦出现，用利爪彻底撕破了这张平静美好的画布。紧接着，内心的暴戾很快以杀戮的形式施予这名不速之客，你知道，她不会再有好结果。至于家庭关系中的裂痕似乎都在意料之中：跟丈夫的开放式关系、对女儿的苛刻并不亚于最残忍的亚洲母亲式“鸡娃”，儿子则基本被她忽视，毫无存在感。要对这样一个女人复仇，必须要夺走的是她最心爱的女儿以及她的希望，让她不再有退路。而她“如同尸体分泌黏液”一样的本质的生活，将恶心她自己并恶心所有人。至于恐怖片的“借尸还魂”倒不是什么新招了。
我不对劲，看完这部电影又开始想看人外的本子
压根没打磨过剧本，想一出是一出，又想讽刺女性又把男性拍的比女性还愚蠢，画面也拉胯，从怪物到人的过程割裂、毫不猎奇
20220520 周五 16:44 哪个才是我？暗黑那个？被俘虏的那个？杀死我的那个！通通都是我，自己造的因自己承受恶果。家庭表面和谐的假象存在着多少秘密，竟可以共存就是畸形的关系，哪个也不正常，正常就不是一个真正的家庭啦！
妈妈的设定好疯我好爱（既然是心理惊悚就不要把鸟设计的这么恶心了吧。。。
有怪物出现，还没什么可说，可是共用身体伤害是什么操作。她的邻居也太惨了，狗被弄死，自己也受重伤。
感觉没演完，真正恐怖的不应该是怪鸟真正变成女儿以后的事情么？
北欧真喜欢拍这种原始宗教隐喻题材，比如羊崽，芬兰语听起来很有趣，像亚洲语言。开篇那种茶里茶气的inst风视频就让人感觉不妙。但是那个芬兰风格白白净净的家里怎么就没有真力音箱呢？
我吐了，看的人真他么着急 ，那个女的也是真变态 我c
好好一部亲情片，非要拍成恐怖片，整个剧组都变态……
这样的妈妈太窒息了，不作为的爸爸同样令人绝望
圆梦童年~皮皮鲁和鲁西西是八零后，所以电影呈现的是九十年代的风格，大白兔奶糖，红绿水壶，圆罐头，焦虑的妈妈们，我已经不记得从前看的鲁西西和罐头小人的故事是怎样的了，但是无论故事怎样我都很激动，身边都是爸爸妈妈带着孩子来看电影，也许和我一样，更多的是为了圆自己小时候的梦吧！最高光时刻就是最后的彩蛋了，路人郑渊洁大叔~希望更多的郑渊洁宇宙能搬上荧幕！
北欧有鸟，其名为鸦，化而为人，可取而代之。鸟人可怕，但比鸟人更可怕的，是抖音女皇妈妈，极端表演型人格的背后，是极度自私，如果能博得粉丝一赞，她能生吃了自己女儿
基本忠于原著吧，里面很多台词和桥段都是意向深刻的。毕竟这是我最幸福的童年的记忆。还不错吧。
原生家庭的恐怖童话，最后坏女儿的长成让病态的母亲眼中闪过更加强烈的希望，似乎一切都没有得到好转。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
