Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
拍摄的很业余剪辑很差 但是题材和对话有意思想法很不错
看得时候怀疑我的IQ过低所以我看的有点晕乎，但有评论说电影和原著出入比较大。好奇又看了原著，emmm，确实仿佛两个故事了，原著本身就挺精彩，不知道为嘛要加上那一段隐喻精神病人脑内幻想的碎片场景，解读过度，打算把佛洛依德和茨威格合体一下？？
挺讽刺的喜剧小品（2020.0505豆瓣6.9分）
太恶俗了，尺度超级大，竟然一直吃人肉，讽刺+脑洞大，看得有点反感，也讽刺了很多素食主义者的偏见
实际上。。。。猪的脂肪率要比人的低多了，夫妻俩还在找那么肥的素食者，伊朗猪好吃难道是所谓的脂肪香么？哈哈哈
吃人是真是假单说，吃素的这套理论吓到我了是真
还行的，其实女主更变态一点，胖小孩和女婿都想吃掉😂不过素食者应该跟牛羊肉差不多吧，男女主应该都有品鉴能力了😁
女儿男友这个角色真是栩栩如生，就是我在德国遇到的极端素食婊，表面说是个人选择，当和你混熟后就开始在你吃肉时对吃肉行为指指点点，让你毫无胃口。电影还算有趣，但剧情和结尾可以做得更好。
想起一个更极端的群体 果食主义者 植物也是有生命的 所以只吃自然掉落下来的果实...
荒诞喜剧，还挺有意思的，就一条路走到黑。
精神的剥削比肉体的受难来的更苦一些。不同时空场景的转换和对比。大型PTSD现场。男主给我的感觉非常像麦叔，看评论很多都再说跟原著差太多，可能因为我没有看过原著，所以觉得作为一部完整的影片来说还是蛮不错的。最近看的一本书还有这部电影都提到了《奥德赛》，我决定找时间来看一下。
好好看哦，一路嘲讽政治正确，台词幽默细节到位！真好！
动物世界那段笑傻了。总体来说没什么内涵，是部解压片
不是我的菜，剧情还行，但是我看的这版字幕翻译有些滞后，所以观看体验没有那么好。屠夫疯狂屠杀疯狂的素食主义者vegan。
男主一个人撑起一部戏。两条线交错，最后ending在精神病院。导致我有些混乱前面所有的故事全都是臆想，还是酒店的部分是真实？
其实镜头语言和剧本结构比不上《新鲜》，但画面和台词上的恶趣味确实一流，所以对于我来说，可能更喜欢这种流畅的爽片（？）。80
片名让我很想吃肉，但是希望小盆友们不要误导被，朊病毒了解下。节奏慢了点，结尾不喜欢，不然还能更高分！字幕组真的皮，还黄秋生，我丢！
帕氏夫妇屠杀记，黄秋生的叉烧包躺枪！伊朗猪肉，雪花牛肉得要肥的，黑色幽默风格，素食主义和肉食主义者的社会对立！最后结尾转变的有些快，假如警察把那三个被杀的素食者当凶手，可能讽刺效果会更好！看完后突然想吃五花肉了！
人生的含义是什么，是奋斗。奋斗的动力是什么，是成功。
好幸福～此生我都无法奢望的美妙爱情！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
