Middle class student Bob Letellier enters a new world when he meets Alain, a free-thinking rebel who, along with his group of young Parisians, has opted for a life of instant gratification instead of work and commitment. At a party, Bob meets a young woman, Mic, who appears to be just as carefree and cynical as Alain. Mic's only dream is to own a luxury car, and with Bob's help, she manages to find the money to but it. Mic's friend Clo discovers she is pregnant and, not knowing who the father is, she asks Bob to marry her. When they next meet at a party, Bob and Mic deny that they have any feelings for one another - a declaration that soon leads to tragedy...
Marcel Carné is widely regarded as one of the standard bearers of French quality cinema of the 1930s and 1940s, responsible for such masterpieces as Quai des brumes (1938) and Les Enfants du Paradis (1945). How ironic then that, in 1958, towards the end of his film-making career, he should make a film which dared to portray the attitudes and behaviour of the 1950s youth, in a way that effectively captures the mood and sentiment of the time.
Les Tricheurs was a hugely controversial film, not least because of its blatant depiction of adolescent free-love, and was even banned in some regions of France. It also received some intensely unfavourable reviews, most notably from the young hotheads on the Cahiers du cinéma such as François Truffaut who cited this film as a prime example of the decline of French cinema into mediocrity. In spite of all this negative press, the film proved to be an astonishing commercial success, attracting five million cinema-goers, and was awarded the Grand Prix du Cinéma français in 1958.
Whilst Les Tricheurs is not as flawless as Carné's earlier masterpieces, it is nonetheless a significant work, having the power to both shock and move its audience, whilst having great entertainment value. It evokes the mood of its time in a way that few French films of this period did, depicting young people as pleasure-seeking rebels, rejecting the austerity and discipline of the previous generation whilst pursuing a life without cares, responsibilities or love. Similarities with James Dean's films of the 1950s (most notably Rebel without a Cause) are apparent, although Carné's treatment of young people is far more abstract - in his film they merely symbolise a world that has lost its way, more or less victims of post-war prosperity. Although the young people in Les Tricheurs lack the authenticity to be totally credible, the film does make an important, and indeed quite disturbing point, about where the permissive society may be heading.
Much of the pleasure of the film is in the performances from its four lead actors, Jacques Charrier, Pascale Petit, Laurent Terzieff and Andréa Parisy, although only Terzieff is really convincing in his role. Marcel Carné originally considered Alain Delon and Jean-Paul Belmondo for the parts of Bob and Alain respectively, before opting for Charrier and Terzieff. As a consolation, Carné offered Belmondo a smaller part in the film - alas too small for the actor to be noticed by the public. Belmondo's breakthrough had to wait until the following year when he starred in Jean-Luc Godard's revolutionary A bout de souffle, a film which offers a very different perspective of the youth generation.
影片挺虐，可似乎并没有“那么虐”。
快看瞌睡了。依然是散装家庭式故事，但是却没有《小偷家族》那般震撼，也没有日系的那种深沉情感，整部影片的情绪浮于表面，比白开水还无趣，明明有很多引爆的点，是枝裕和却什么都没有做，换个人拍，加点动作戏，节奏紧张一点也许更好，IU不错！
头一次来高先电影院，也一同标记
套路化的是枝裕和....这样对比的话，《真相》好太多了吧，当年没进戛纳太可惜了
其实素英这个角色很值得挖掘一下，这个电影其实聚焦的是母子关系，母亲和被抛弃的孩子，在“感谢你的诞生”这个桥段里，素英成为了所有人的母亲，这个抽象身份的完成其实很值得玩味，素英一开始是以一个绝对失格的母亲形象出现，到这里在其他人的帮助和要求下彻底完成了母职并进行了升格，很有意思。
感覺尚沒融入韓國文化，所以水土不服，只能硬套既有的創作能量進不同環境使用，看出是枝到了某個關口。現在一直拍國際電影感覺只是為了集郵，還是終得要回日本去啊。
印象最深的竟然是饼叔”女儿”留下那个没吃的pancake。没有相关性，但莫名想起了大一开学前爸妈送到宿舍来却没能吃掉的那一大袋零食。
还是那样温柔的是枝裕和，从不刻意煽情的剧情，但却最为感人。他们是掮客，是杀人犯、性工作者，是孤儿，但却不是恶人。（裴斗娜又演女警，梦回李英男哈哈
剧情的结构不错，再联想到最近的社会新闻。。。但影帝的表演真的没什么出彩。
在警察潜伏追踪途中，也看到了这一组临时家庭的默契与温馨，他们都有美好的结局。
当妈之后人真的会变，以前看，第一反应肯定是是枝裕和又在重复自己、IU接不住戏、剧本太圣母太悬浮……现在是天可怜见的、哭死我了、太心酸了，电影看完了还在惦念两个孩子的命运。只想说，是枝裕和稳住了人类情感的基本盘。
是枝裕和开启周游列国模式，最后发现只能回归本国，但现在还没到点。
这世界时常糟糕，时常失控，别担心，你永远被爱着。替所有被抛弃的被抱养的小孩和父母把破碎的心缝补了，我愿称是枝裕和为心灵裁缝，他所有题材都在亲子关系（被抛弃/血缘关系/父母缺位……），就做自己茶杯里的小风暴，也能雨露均沾各位干涸的看客。
是枝裕和这次用了类型化，传统的戏剧式结构下，用一个整的悬念包裹住这个“家庭”——究竟送子的下一站在哪？“掮客”的题材是冰冷和现实的，成为装载的背景，无论是弃婴到福利院，还是收留弃儿去卖淫，影片的主体笔力放在人物变化以及情感上面，即女主对于孩子的情感变化和这个家庭的关系变化。我一直对于人物的动机无法认同，他们组成这样一个家庭去干这样一件事，在这个过程里抱团取暖，一定是需要外界对他们很冰很冰才可以，也就是他们这个戏剧行动一定是在很冰的外围下做起来才有意义，我没觉得他们有多么惨，我也无法在这场行动中共情他们，是枝裕和对微妙情感的处理还是很到位，我不知道有什么原因，这个电影在多线索去撕扯这个类似于公路片过程中，将一切消解了，我更想看到的是我前面提到的：明明那么冰，明明很陌生，却能一路同行互相温暖。
这是一个诞生于「爱与罪与罚」叙事框架下，有着「监督+生产+销售」明确分工的「商业」组织，他们「笼络人心」对东亚家庭宣传的逻辑是，与其在一个存在系统漏洞和暗箱操作的托管机构里没有希望地活着，不如「你和你的作品」脱离那个教会般的「命运」共同体，通过「非法」手段，加入这个貌似明亮温暖的「利益」共同体——在《小偷家族》式的荣光中长大。然而，孩子从哪来本身值得商榷，能否成为人「艺术本身」而非一件商品也有诸多不确定性。看过《德意志零年》的观众大概知道，人格化意识形态一定是有「恋童」癖好的。而看过《葛罗达的新娘》也可了解，西方「三权分立」体制看似完美，实则「自由民主」外衣下掩饰的是「政教合一」本质。导演如此卖力地为这样一个吸食「美国」奶粉的《掮客》群体摇旗洗地，不得不令观众怀疑他是否获得了「基金会」支持。
3.5。一個換湯不換藥韓版《小偷家族》的概念。場面調度好得沒話說，敘事稍微有點拖。
为什么找李知恩这装B脸啊，资本的推力吗，完全毁了这电影，宋康昊都救不了。
喜欢不起来，角色和角色之间都没啥火花，有看到说IU被台词膈应到而去找导演讨论的新闻，我想大概就是和裴斗娜争辩那场，说实在的那个台词也有膈应到我，还有最后酒店关灯那场戏是要干嘛……饼叔绝对值得拿戛纳影帝，但绝对不是凭这个片拿。
列车行驶时的谈话，光和暗影间或笼罩着素英的脸，现实和what if交错，美好终究还是delusion。
日本导演拍的韩国电影，有些不伦不类。是枝裕和固然是一位好导演，但在处理更富有戏剧冲突的剧本时，他的功力是要打折的，即便是《小偷家族》都不好。此片就像包裹着日式清晰，但此类剧本通常处理起来需要韩式爆裂演绎的催化才更能感染人，所以故事始终缺了一份力量感。而这个结尾简直是牛头不对马嘴，仿佛开车出去无所事事逛了一大圈，怅然若失回到了原地，才忽然想起刚才是要出去买烟的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
