Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
为了童年的记忆，路过电影院正好看见这个，好多小孩看哭了……
不理解为什么那么多人都觉得不好看，我觉得挺好的，唯一想吐槽的就是李小曼为什么这么像偶像剧里的恶毒女配？(⍥(⍥(⍥(⍥(⍥;;)
郑老师原版小说更像是成年人的童话，这部又改成了比较低幼的画风，倒也还行，只是电影里郑渊洁的一些内涵和主题的深度没能呈现出来，最后发表的主旨升华也略显苍白无力和牵强，但当成罐头小人和皮皮鲁鲁西西的友情来看还是不错的，这一版让我比较惊喜的还是几个小演员的表演，比较超出我预期，以及没想到皮威的扮演者居然是王老师
句末彩蛋提到了一个关键词魔方大厦，大概暗示下一部是魔方大厦？
（不过本来也没有什么好办法）
这20年的教育改革还是有效果的。至少现在没有老师强占体育老师的课了。
慢慢全程哭了三四回，有害怕的哭，有委屈的哭，有伤心的哭，也有最后高兴的哭。我是没想到，她看明白了多少。
陪孩子们看，小学一年级能看懂了。在如今双减背景下，这片子很有意义了。郑渊洁爷爷超前了30年，厉害极了。
为什么只有徐老师是RH阴型血，这背后有什么惊天秘密🤔🤔
这也太…“复古”了吧 从场景到表演风格到制作水准仿佛都倒退到了80年代 看得出大部分人都对郑渊洁有情怀 不然也不会在一边倒的负评上还给三颗星
小孩子应该会喜欢这部电影，我旁边小男孩看哭了，都直揉眼睛。感觉大人和年轻的朋友也能看下去，时间不长，剧情也很简单。结局有些强行正能量和合家欢，但大概是目前只能这样拍吧。
一分给福尔摩斯🐶，全场演技最佳。平平无奇的电影，特效再给一分，情怀再来一分，不能再多了。还没有双人同行游戏好玩
保持童真很重要，这部片其实大人带着孩子看比较好，时间定在1985年，片中保留了复古元素，也有当前时尚漂亮的校服，当年确实都特别看重学习成绩，忽视孩子们的兴趣爱好，片中传递的价值观很明确，就是应试教育和素质教育的对立统一，老师和学生的关系，家长和孩子的关系都有很明显的印证，所以这部看似童话故事的儿童片他还是适合家长老师孩子一起看看的，但是我们当年教育的缺陷，执行好双减政策，都有一定的启发，保持童真的心很重要，勇于去探索未知世界。
这个选角想打一星，为什么皮皮鲁选了一个就鲁西西弟弟一样的小男孩？？？PS: RH阴性血那段印象太深刻了，就是这个小说让我知道还有这个血型的
现在看有一些古早了，改编的部分也不如原著。
《童话大王》绝对是我最小时候的付费文学，为郑芭比打call，上尉还赚了一把热泪。
本来只是为情怀买单，结果被小演员们的演技和改编故事的完成度惊喜到！bug肯定有，结尾略草率，给小朋友的话够看啦。
广州百丽宫影城超前点映，等13号上影再详细点评，可以是今年遇到一部有趣的电影🎬
3-
本来童年滤镜加郑渊洁可以给打个5星的鼓励分，但是有几处改编，觉得实在不行，于是扣掉一颗星。希望再接再厉。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
