A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
很真实很搞笑，这个妈妈在某些方面太像我妈妈了我敢肯定像绝大部分中国妈妈，结尾带着妈妈去找媳妇拍的好，找到一份家里人祝福的感情太难了，男主哭着分手演的好，两边都是自己爱的人，这电影给了你解决这问题的答案，只要你妈妈不是太迂腐，就向她证明你有多爱她，她有多爱你，因为这种事情分手只能说明两个人没有那么相爱吧。
妈妈演得真好。有一个潮汕海边的空镜让我想起恋恋风尘最后那个云卷云舒的长镜头。
以俗套的爱情故事为主线，夹杂着有关隔代思想矛盾和地域文化差异的表达。潮汕地区特有的拜拜，邻里之间的攀比与祝福，母子间激烈的争吵，这是一部属于小镇青年的电影，源于导演和编剧生命体验的私人影像。但是人类的情感是相通的，尤其喜欢最后手机拍摄的坐飞机在西湖出游片段。让我想起初中时妈妈带我去游乐园玩一起坐过山车时她紧张的样子，原来天底下的妈妈都一样，有时候“不讲道理”有时候又温柔可爱。前半段稍微有些生硬，后面渐入佳境。
完全出乎意料的好看，本来看着演员觉得有点路人和出戏，但是随着剧情的推进，他们的演技很自然真诚，就完全被打动，观影一气呵成的愉悦，影片真的把普通人和普通事拍的那么有趣且动人～
唱戏做生意。父亲人设立住。
好好看，好真实，在深圳的打工人看哭了至少3次。
潮汕家庭的恶臭溢出屏幕了，但里面的素人演员都太过可爱，整容脸儿媳的形象虽然刻板，但在片子的氛围里也没那么讨厌，还不错。
虽然男女主毫无co感。但是南方真好。带入一下静珊离开的心情感觉都要爆哭。很平凡的电影，细节很好，妈妈很真实。就是最后的剧情有点别扭。
2022开年黑马之作，小成本制作但相当用心，配乐好好听好舒服。广东非潮汕人表示看得懂，毕竟身边潮汕人挺多而且工作原因去过潮汕好多次，文化风俗美食都拍得很贴地气，简直把我看饿了。只是末段拍得反差有点大，突然去到西湖有点突兀，结束的飞机长镜头不知道想表达什么，男主演技一般天台分手戏太尬了。好久没试过完全依靠字幕看电影，眼睛太累了而且也错过了好多细节。
不足是，故事层面过于简单、老套，有些地方不够流畅，转折没有说服力，强行大团圆还不如就定格在机场那场戏；男女主角CP感不够，有的素人演员看着太出戏；空镜部分有点刻意。
不需要明星，不需要流量，不需要话题，就针对普普通通很家长，很好看！
好好讲个小故事似乎很难
意外的不错，从主角到配角都人物丰满，角色全部都立的住，包括和妈妈拌嘴的那个老阿姨
7.7分#有趣的客家话，可爱的人物，真实的烟火气，是个令人惊喜的作品了～唯一的小遗憾是结局太仓促了
从客观的角度看，整体呈现不错。不过有些片段，还是让人感觉有点不舒服吧。
听说男主爸妈真实他爸妈来的，一家人都这么会演戏吗？
不过也是为了切合他们两人分开的主要原因。
平平常常唠家常生活化的片子 还挺可爱的 现代和传统的冲突又无处不在 虽然我不大相信这么轻松就和解了 现实生活中根深蒂固的观念改变绝非易事 也许是电影表达的一种理想希冀吧 妈妈最后指着保俶塔说雷峰塔
珊珊好像张碧晨啊，总觉得她下一秒就要拿起话筒“循着光照的方向 把你遗忘”
挺惊喜的居然是用的练江口音，整体感觉会更亲切一些，毕竟作为潮阳这块的人。而且这部电影其实整个两广地区都适合看，毕竟文化都差不多是这样，都是父母抗拒所谓的外省，然而就因此耽搁了很多人
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
