This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .
印度之所以能拍出这样的好片子，还是因为本身社会问题太混乱！！！
本片高潮在法庭辩论的反转环节，能将政治阴谋、种姓歧视、学术腐败、操控媒体这么多黑暗的权利游戏一起呈现，已然了不得。在泯灭良心的政治家的眼里，民众是猪狗。另外，不喜欢印度电影频频出现的bgm。
几个反转来得质感不足，没有营造出让观众信服的氛围就反转了，极其缺乏震撼。
好题材，好内容。拍的不好，声效使用太不节制了，处处都在煽情，而且场景的作用和意图，混乱重复，抓不住重点，几处反转也没有层层递进，不是一部电影的感觉。
一口气杂糅一堆社会现实，强行反转，印度演员表演上都用力过度
也太drama了 克制点冷静的讲故事不好吗 非得整的跟印度歌舞似的那么热闹 //片头那一大段把死的活的在朝的在野的这个邦那个教的现实的精神的都摘了个干净 那么强的求生欲有些人看不见非得搁那夹枪带棒叭叭叭
真相…
良心发现，英雄出现，民众狂欢。
2个小时足够了，根本没必要再搞出那么多人和背景故事出来，把想要抨击的对象编得愚蠢并不是多高明得手段，而且，其实这种片子拍多了反而让人觉得在印度什么都挺儿戏，警察，法律，大学，媒体，公众，政客。。。。
最近看的几部印度电影，杰伊比姆、一个星期四和这部，都有反转，都在批判，揭露印度社会体制问题，虽然掀起反抗的都是个人，似乎仅凭借个别人的力量是无法撼动问题的根本的，而且他们的做法现实中可行性、成功率太低，印度的问题是错综复杂的绝不仅仅是影片指出的体制问题。但总归有人在反思，哪怕这个国家糟透了。
印度拍出了法制题材影片新高度。司法正义并不是群众的正义，影片探讨了多个社会热点议题，但是最让人深刻的就是律师对多数人的暴政所提出的批判。
由性犯罪到学阀制下的学术垄断，抽丝剥茧却原来都是政治的筹码，法庭陈述还请诸位对照观看，看的我是无味杂陈、肝气郁结。是什么时候左邻与右舍开始甩开我们，叩问反思、揭露针砭，谁是宿敌？正义，还是tm的正义；人民，还是tm的人民！
连续看了几部“高分推荐”的印度神片，发现都是套路。其中之一就是一定要反转，尤其喜欢结尾反转，而且还要反转再反转。#疲乏#。另外这片电影长度如果能缩减到90或者120分钟会更好。电影过长，要批判的内容又那么多，观众没这么多#耐心#。
印度新片，直面社会犯罪案件，情节几次大反转，虽然漏洞很多，还可看。
可以看出想表达的很多就是觉得节奏可以改改，前面铺垫好长最后十几分钟好赶
影片用反转又反转抛出了印度社会的根本问题：制度性腐败，可惜并没有在影片结尾给出我们答案，甚至当观众以为律师是理性的化身之时，又通过一次反转告诉我们这一切的动机是为了复仇。影片最奇怪的地方在于，它用一种煽动式的电影语言告诉观众：不要被媒体煽动，不要被政客煽动。但是它的核心观点之一还是勇敢的，大概可以总结为八个字：去你妈的种姓制度。
What goes around comes around.
每抛一个严肃社会议题探讨却浮于表面。
一般般吧，我感觉自己看到了很早之前的韩片套路，对这种套路感到厌烦
题材非常棒，160多分钟里讨论了好多内容，虽然气氛有点刻意煽情，但真诚地努力和勇敢地发声就值得尊敬。啊…我们还在各种悬浮到奇葩的浪漫轻喜剧里奋勇挣扎，希望文化教育能早日跟上经济的步伐，无知傲慢的人终将自食恶果。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
