Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
没有国语版，陪孩子看个热闹，听不懂他看的也很开心
超赞的电影，制作的太棒了，一定要有续集啊！可惜没有在电影院看，不然肯定可以和孩子们一起唱主题曲！
成年人看也意外的很有意思，如果翻译上能稍微遵从一下TV版会更好，那一句句的“ahhhchi”真叫的让人出戏。
剧情对不到三岁的娃而言还是比较复杂的。娃看完表示再也不想看汪汪队立大功了，老母亲表示不理解。
#汪汪队立大功大电影#第一部带儿子在电影院看的电影。就冲这一点，这部电影对于我就有特殊的记忆。狗狗们上了大荧幕，到了大城市，迎接更大的危机和更复杂的挑战，内心戏的添加和前传的引入无疑也为整个故事增加更多的层次和内涵。勇敢与协作，帮助与宽容，汪汪队系列确实是正能量十足的好动漫。
啊，陪女儿看的，老父亲觉得装备有点帅啊…莱德这不竞选市长？？
南方巨兽楼被拍得毫无气势，大概就是本片失败的缩影
跑跑跑 打打打 boss也太后知后觉了，全世界都知道黑人小哥是卧底了他才意识到，只能成为恐龙的一餐了 只有萝莉好看
儿子很喜欢，不知道会不会被打，我全程打游戏，两儿子很专注
孩子看的嗷嗷兴奋到热泪盈眶出了电影院还沉浸在剧情里无法自拔，并且为了阿奇流下了奶茶味道的眼泪。而我只在想：又要出新玩具了╥﹏╥
看的中文版。然后作用就是促进舅侄间的感情。
还行，制作挺精良的，故事对于小孩子来说也够用了。还是传统的拯救世界套路，适合5岁娃看
汪汪队装备集体更新，队员又多了个贝贝，真不错。
有些政治正确孩子也不懂，还挺好。
画面提升很多，比电视剧版提升巨大，也提起了阿奇的过去，可惜时间只有1小时出头，不错的作品
被儿子拉了看了两遍——装备超级酷炫，海丁格市长太像是封闭特朗普了。
恐龙5星，人类0星，综合一下2.5星
现在汪汪队剧场版有着像柯南剧场版看齐的趋势，剧情不重要，画面才是重头。环保，爱狗，有点像爱宠大机密的感觉了…救援主题果然适合小孩子
很棒的电影。好莱坞对待每一步电影都用心，对孩子的事情没有自上而下地俯视，而是take it serious. 配乐也格外优秀！
剧情还是很有意思的，制作也很精良
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
