Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
作为一部动画片，其实真没那么差，该有的也都有了，虎墩可爱、勇敢、机智，孩子们应该都喜欢，只是电影票确实有点贵，电脑上看看就行了。
故事简单不拖沓 人设也都立得住 制作要是再能精细一点就更棒了 7分
勉强五星，到达奥德后拍的有点拖沓。前半段是真精彩啊，景就更不用说了，很不错的一部电影～
华夏发行确实牛逼，春晚乳虎啸春里乳虎的造型不用说肯定是华夏的小动作。
又臭又长没耐心看。可能是理解不了这种少数派国家的风格。
现在拍电影对剧本的要求这么低么…逻辑简直…剧中只有几个冰面画面还可以…整个故事就是瞎讲…
定位不太准确，对幼儿来说太成熟说教了，对大点的孩子来说又老套了些。2D比3D好。少些网络用语吧，有些出戏。
摄影很有视觉张力，浅蓝+暗灰调色以及氛围渲染隔着屏幕都能感受到的空旷寒冷，这是个人喜欢的点。但剧情简单，中规中矩（女主的自私也不掖着，直接摊牌，很蠢就是了）感觉xx行动、xx营救大多都是一贯的套路手法，没什么新的点…但毕竟都网飞了，无脑爽就行，还要什么自行车？
意料之外，全片更像是一个小虎墩视角下的武侠动画片，对中国传统冷兵器，武术还有侠之情义都做了自己的理解与诠释。小虎墩的表情也很生动，就是感觉几段故事连接不是很顺畅，到最后送什么镖有何意义也没交代。全片创作顺序就像是1 小虎墩形象很好，给他编个电影故事吧。2.小虎墩要在送镖中得到成长。3.送镖也要遇到内外的阻力……故事就这么编成了~其实很可惜，这故事对武侠迷来说还是很有吸引力的，宣发时非要对准幼众。结果小孩儿看不懂，能看懂的错过没去看，可惜可惜
放在平时倒算是一部简单的薯片剧，但是放在现在的俄乌冲突下就不免会带入角色，不禁去思考战争和冲突给我们带来的是什么。乌克兰和西方国家真的应该想想，用战争来遏制战争，这种先入为主的思想到底是对是错。特别是到现在，还有不少西方是要源源不断的运送武器，生怕这场冲突很快停止一样。
心情不好的时候随便选的片看，至少缓解了心情，虽然没治愈
不知道说些啥。
勉强三星 差不多是2.5 冰上送快递确实太美了 其他都很无聊 剧情很渣
虽然有点隔靴搔痒，但是没有5.8这么不堪吧
听说女儿人在基地，什么勾吧人类，亡不亡的关老娘屁事！
其实挺应景的 ，战争中没有所谓的绝对正确和绝对错误，这堂现实的公正课里，没有人能给出答案。倒是喜欢这种不撕心裂肺的调子，仔细回味还是有挺多值得说的点。
这不是一部爽片，这一部反乌托邦的作品。
结局比较套路，过程不够精彩，全程比较闷，没多少令人眼前一亮的场景，所以一直走神。女主前后矛盾，开始不考虑世界毁灭女儿的安慰，后来发现女儿不在基地又说这是保护女儿的最好方法，叫人无法共情。演员演的很卖力，演技也很好，穿越冰面时的场景跟独特，很美。但是无法掩盖剧本的空洞。中规中矩的一部作品。
前半段挺现实主义的，各种渲染，服化道都好；冰上潜行也有新奇效应。基地后的情景就太儿戏了，烂尾可惜。
虽然不是好莱坞出品的，但是也算是一部不错的战争片。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
