Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
快结束的时候我前排有个人看了眼手机，是21点10分，从这个时候开始连续be，be到21点30分电影放完，就是强行煽情大过年的给你喂玻璃渣的感觉。。。另：老年cp那对的结局说实话我是不太相信的😅
刚从电影院出来，五味杂陈。影片立意高格局大，但几个故事都讲的狗血甚至离谱了，影片某些地方传递的价值观也无法理解。但也是要借此机会对所有抗疫的英雄们致敬！影片一星给抗疫题材，一星给贾玲。
剧本问题，全是符号化的角色，结构也很成问题，太碎了。
治愈每一个走过2020-2021的人，再见2021
没想到会这么难看，某些情节简直是对两年疫情的不尊重。
以小爱汇聚成大爱，致敬每一个在疫情期间依旧坚守岗位的普通人。
本片真实却不乏感动，严肃却不失幽默，在我们共同经历新冠疫情的难关后，我们能真实地体会到当年那些为防疫做出伟大贡献的各行各业的英雄们的事迹，有你们，我们便有了勇气，有我们国人的众志成城，我们就有了战胜困难的决心！最后以此片结尾的字幕作为结语去祈祷：愿悲伤不再，愿人间无恙！
爷爷奶奶这对最感人，其他就很一般
这个题材很难拍好，本子不行，导演不会讲故事。浪费了黄渤好演员，其他演员不评价。
虽然挺感人的，但是感觉就是为了感人而感人，好像导演在说：你给我哭。
作为一部描写疫情的电影，却并没有侧重描写医护工作者，而是聚焦在各行各业各个阶层的平凡人中，能看到你我的影子，虽然并不太喜欢这样又乱又杂的故事剪辑，但还是有被煽情到的故事的，比如老医生的黄昏恋。这两年多来，失去了很多很多，但待到春暖花开，你我终将相见……22.03.03
一般偏上，朱一龙和奶奶两个小剧场还是很惊喜的。。就感觉这部剧很多地方都能结束了，但是他又一直一直拖着。。。结果意难平
两星给武汉的英雄们，一星给演技在线的演员们
情人节一个人在房间爱奇艺花了6块钱看的，6块钱我买瓶啤酒喝不带劲么🙂
两星半吧 有点刻意 但是父母去看会感动到稀里哗啦的作品
电影很生活化也很戏剧化，贾玲的角色太有代入感了！一哭一笑都很好看，几组人物关系设置的也很好，剧作结构也有想法，但是强势煽情，更像是浮光掠影的生活小短片，没有更多深刻性。
演员和题材都不错，但是故事就差点，情感起伏弱了些
一转眼离疫情爆发居然已经两年了 是需要一部这样的片子带我们回忆那个时期的悲喜离合 这样才会更加珍惜拥有吧 感恩所有奋战在一线的医护和志愿者们
8/10.做了奉献和牺牲的人生就是伟大的人生，就应该被歌颂。贾玲真是个宝藏演员，演得太自然了。
太刻意的煽情了，煽情贵在自然和打动人心，不是生硬“凹造型”
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
