剧情介绍

  这是Richard Lester最好的一个片。
  An absurdist classic
  This is a wonderful surreal comedy based on the play by Spike Milligan and John Antrobus. You know that it is going to be an odd film right at the beginning, when the opening credits list the cast in order of their height. The film begins with the BBC (Frank Thornton) telling us through the facade of an old television that this is the third, or is it the fourth?, anniversary of the shortest war in history, lasting 2 hours and 28 minutes. England is now a barren landscape, littered with derelict cars and buildings, hills of old boots, broken crockery, and other debris. Forty million people perished and there are only 20 known survivors. The Queen did not survive, and of the 20 known survivors the next in line for the throne is a Mrs Ethel Schroake of 393a High Street, Leytonstone. Among the other survivors are Ralph Richardson (O Lucky Man!) as Lord Fortnum of Alamein, who isn't looking forward to his impending mutation into a bed sitting room. Michael Hordern is Bules Martin, who wears a 18-carat Hovis bread ring. Spike Milligan is a postman who wanders around and delivers some memorable dialogue, for example: "And in come the three bears - the daddy bear said, 'Who's been sleeping in my porridge?' - and the mummy bear said, 'that's no porridge, that was my wife' ". Arthur Lowe is slowly turning into a parrot (which is then eaten by Spike Milligan), while his wife, the owner of her own death certificate, turns into a wardrobe. His daughter is pregnant with a strange creature, which she has held inside her for seventeen months. Peter Cook and Dudley Moore are a pair of policemen who perpetually tell the others to "keep moving!". Moore growls a lot and turns into a dog at the end. Marty Feldman is a wellington-boot-wearing nurse. It's a hilarious, absurdist treat, and one of my treasured filmic pleasures.

评论:

  • 敏寒 9小时前 :

    颇写实的片子,所谓文明社会,却歧视偏见处处……但愿公义长存。

  • 念友瑶 6小时前 :

    没有想象的优秀,还是一贯的宝莱坞作风,黑白分明。

  • 凡斌 4小时前 :

    …拍得太模式化脸谱化了,社会性+足量的煽情+戏剧化。

  • 方远航 5小时前 :

    非必要不看印度电影,出发点不错,多少有点在侮辱智商,给你的美国人大哥去看吧!

  • 宦浩浩 9小时前 :

    完全听不懂。。。

  • 掌新梅 1小时前 :

    连新酱都开始社畜的可怜了,很少看新酱的剧场,但确实得夸元素过多,讲的深浅易明,虽然得承认我冲着新风CP去的,哈哈。

  • 夫天晴 8小时前 :

    青春就是这样无意义的热血吧!哪里要什么规矩人生呢!

  • 吕文惠 8小时前 :

    猛烈讽刺了警界的黑暗,但还是克制了:总警监保有良心,叫女主姐姐穿上裙子的老警员也保有良心。电影上映审查局:嗯,允许上映

  • 容宛秋 2小时前 :

    题材本身的社会属性远远大于电影本身,能有强大的社会思考,但是于电影而言,只是一部成步堂龙一的逆转爽片

  • 定水蓝 4小时前 :

    完全听不懂。。。

  • 喻莎莎 4小时前 :

    看了这部片子觉得印度是有希望的,更加尊敬印度。

  • 巴宛菡 1小时前 :

    走投无路的小民,在正义律师的帮助上走上维权之路。

  • 仪玉轩 1小时前 :

    好看呢,这个评分制一出来我就觉得很贴合小新的风格,故事讲的不错,笑点也有趣,不低级不刻意,水平还是高

  • 宜秋颖 2小时前 :

    地狱空荡荡,魔鬼在人间。不是每一次的伸张正义我们都要当史诗一样去歌颂,但是每一次以个体对抗体制的勇气都会让我们感觉心潮澎湃,用良心去追案,用良心去拍电影,也许人间还值得!

  • 卫家胜 9小时前 :

    2022第一部五分…为天地立心,为生民立命,为万世开太平…

  • 敛幼菱 2小时前 :

    在此宣布印度电影全面赶超韩国电影,已经甩开天朝电影两个日本电影。

  • 业觅晴 3小时前 :

    PS:新年第一天给自己注入一些正气。

  • 婧萱 0小时前 :

    类型化做的挺好的,虽然废戏很多,但节奏还算紧凑,通篇叙事都很流畅。但这也是这部电影最大的问题,为了节奏,很多都太直给了。比如:拍弱者一定是非常夸张的俯拍,拍施暴警察一定是超低角度的仰拍。再比如律师思考的时候,喜欢拍网球,还自言自语(跟廖凡一样)。这些过于“油腻的类型化”的拍摄与叙事技巧往往降低了影片的现实质感与可信度。

  • 东郭晗昱 8小时前 :

    3.5,印度总能拍出这样的电影,真实改编也更具有说服力,想起了我们过往中的一些冤案,不知道能不能拍出来。不过我现在不太吃印度这种类型片的风格~

  • 宏柔绚 8小时前 :

    一来感恩自己能投胎到有人权的时代,二来感恩信息发达让更多的民智大开。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved