In the late 16th century Europe was in the grip of a ferocious witch hunt, where thousands were tortured and burnt at the stake. The church was fully behind this terrifying crusade against the imaginary enemies of Christianity. In France and Germany alone up to 40,000 people may have been killed as witches. But England and Scotland were almost untouched by witch persecutions until King James himself decided to launch his own, personal war on witchcraft.
In 1597 King James VI of Scotland published 'Daemonology', a handbook on how to recognise and destroy, witches. The book explored the threat that 'those Detestable slaves of the Devil', posed to James himself. It fuelled waves of witch hunting throughout Britain.
The legacy of James' 'Daemonology' continued throughout the 17th century, and led to the torture and execution of hundreds of women in a series of infamous witch trials. No-one knows exactly how many men and women died in these trials, such as the Pendle trial of 1612, or how many others were killed in cases that never came to court. The documentary reveals the purges in many areas of Britain drew directly on King James' book. Also for the first time, remarkable new archaeological evidence from Cornwall, suggests that witchcraft was actively practiced for centuries, even during the most intense periods of witch-hunting. Experimental archaeologist Jacqui Wood has excavated strange pits lined with swan's feathers, and filled with animal skins and human remains. She believes the pits were ritual offerings inspired by witchcraft beliefs.
47/100。其实想反应的主题是没有问题的，结尾处甚至有点感同身受的感觉：极端的应试教育对孩子自身全面发展造成的毒害在本片中呈现得淋漓尽致，其中更是穿插了一些与之有关的社会现实体现出的无奈与苦楚，我想这也是郑渊洁的原著隐隐约约试图透露的。但整部电影总的来说还是给人一种不舒服的感觉，且不说类似于《猫》的诡异邪典感，套路无聊的剧情、程式僵化的人物、老旧陈腐的情感表达方式都让观众处于一种烦闷的状态。虽然这是一部儿童电影，但在如今这个孩子普遍早熟的年代，这样的表达方式是不是有点太小看现在的祖国花朵了呢？
徐老师演的像个填鸭机器，后面又莫名煽情，火灾烧的奇奇怪怪，这种特效看着十分尴尬，不如先拍成动画片会比较好，另外，一个拿针当武器的小人输血的时候不会被直接捅死么？
讨论教育的本质，又能在这样一个魔幻的环境里表现现实，童话最本真的爱和勇气也太容易哭了，啊啊啊，四年级一班的皮皮鲁和鲁西西，我的童年！
“大家谁觉得梁果行，举手”，“差生”们纷纷举手，一个女生犹豫没举，然后艺术家说：“不想举就不举”，这种细节设计，真不愧是郑渊洁！
很不错的片子。最后我也猛男落泪了……没什么大毛病，儿童片能有这样的水准就可以了
儿童向电影，儿童的叙事，逻辑，世界观。
“挑战想象的极限，留住好奇心，人生就会灿烂”
3、片尾很好地向小朋友介绍了特效场景是如何拍摄，以及拍摄中的酸甜苦辣；
童年经典还是留在记忆里比较美好，它就留在上世纪那个点看着我们前行就好了。何必拉出来赶鸭子上架，拙劣的鞭尸……
一星给郑渊洁，一星给配乐（魔方大厦的音乐）。
罐头小人，小时候看过的第一部郑渊洁的童话，其实改动很大，成片也完全不是我想象中的样子，大部分内容都很尴尬，但无论如何，我还是爱它
尊重原著作者的同时，也请尊重一下大银幕的，这是电影，又不是奥特曼连环剧，制作成这样最好走网大好些
真的有精神的儿童电影太少了，以郑渊洁的内核讲儿童的故事，是成年人世界最缺乏的。孩子们有自己的思维方式，大人们同样也有，今时代的大人们缺乏倾听孩子们的意识。当鲁西西从房顶下来后，老师们欢呼着抛起西西，而西西却在满眼泪光担心着自己的小伙伴。中国孩子一直被诟病的问题是，缺乏个性化，过于服从集体意志，一个个都被培养成同质化人才，像流水线上的螺丝钉一般。希望皮皮鲁和鲁西西能带给孩子以及家长们个性化的启示。
电影学院这些年出来的无论是导演，摄影还是演员都远不能和八九十年代的比
除了后面火灾的改编有点夸张以外，真的是满分！还原童年幻想，期待魔方大厦
儿童电影，还不错。某些镜头小人还是蛮有绿幕感的，感觉小人用动画呈现会不会好点？
如果这电影是20年前的，肯定好。现在再来谈这种童话，就比较无聊了，5分，勉强吧。无意中从B站推荐看到的，玩游戏时顺便放了下
也是圆了童年的梦吧。小学时最喜欢郑渊洁的病菌集中营
郑老师原版小说更像是成年人的童话，这部又改成了比较低幼的画风，倒也还行，只是电影里郑渊洁的一些内涵和主题的深度没能呈现出来，最后发表的主旨升华也略显苍白无力和牵强，但当成罐头小人和皮皮鲁鲁西西的友情来看还是不错的，这一版让我比较惊喜的还是几个小演员的表演，比较超出我预期，以及没想到皮威的扮演者居然是王老师
最震撼的莫过于看弹幕说歌唱家后来嫁给了贝塔（没错就是开坦克那个
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
