巴斯克维尔的猎犬 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 恐怖片 2008

导演: Carl Lamac

剧情介绍

  A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
  Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
  This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
  One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
  - JohnHowardReid, imdb

评论:

  • 鹏佑 3小时前 :

    看不懂的、名导导的、名演员演的,一律算好片。

  • 祁颖宁 8小时前 :

    3. 很多人把这部电影与《钛》进行比较,虽然两者的表现方式有些相似,但是导演想表达的想法是完全不同的。《钛》想表达的是渴望重新拥有最纯粹而真实的人性,这是一种精神上的追求;而《未来罪行》则选择回归肉体,去探寻肉体的意义。

  • 象玉泉 0小时前 :

    哈哈果然是行为艺术现场,充满了影射暗喻和艺术家的逆向思考,小k表演最出彩,暗合了神秘的双向吸引力,又有点疯狂和诡谲,某种层面上,成为影片气质的投射

  • 苍沈靖 6小时前 :

    可以质疑如此这般的“未来”,但一定要退回到现在甚至过去吗?

  • 静妍 7小时前 :

    就为了看吾皇的美颜,请允许我表情包评论:我看不懂,但我大受震撼

  • 璟蕾 3小时前 :

    打开肉体的同时,思想也在被解放。疼痛,性欲,艺术,政治,最终升华到人类身体与意识的二元进化。作为科幻片,这个创意赞了,100分钟的故事还很初级,似乎只做了个设定,便戛然而止,但太多线索还亟待展开,柯南伯格要拍个限定剧,我肯定还是会追

  • 谈贞芳 2小时前 :

    柯南伯格职业生涯的一次回望???泛黄的复古影像又带有些许未来感。前半段重回早期的感官刺激形式,后半段又来了一出政治隐喻戏码,几乎是两部电影。无用的生理器官是构建“艺术”的桥梁,从疼痛中寻找性爱的快感,完全把握人身构造,利用人类对身体的迷恋,宛如传教士一般操纵人们,观者满足于一场视觉奇观,器官摘除者与被摘除者也满足了自身的“性爱需求”。政府是一切掌控的观察者,资本、个体都不能过界,“行为艺术家”需要在一片朦胧中寻找“界限”,而政府则需要人类保持肉身。当然,人是寻找极限的物种,高潮感永远难忘,即使被勒令禁止,也不会停下来,意志会被继承,新的感官形式与器官进化也会到来,柯南伯格拍得极具诗意。第一场切割秀视听非常出彩,第二场感受美蕾的演技,以及氛围营造。

  • 禄雅逸 2小时前 :

    body is reality. body is politics.

  • 郏伟祺 9小时前 :

    高概念下竟如此保守,把人类进化的探讨拉低到要通过手术,切割去体会新性爱及快感。不得不说,格局小了。

  • 涵梅 8小时前 :

    #Lab111# 电影的镜头没有啥特别突出的点,构图倒是非常舒适,让几场戏都带有强烈的宗教感,女主女配初遇的戏构图上带有对照感,也是对应在后期阐述的新式与老式,“理想”与“现实”的对照关系。音效中时常出现的苍蝇声是在提醒我们这“新现实”对应在影片未来反乌托邦的设定中,能从影片中体会到一种存在主义感,主要源于片中对于肉体存在的定义及最后的结局给我的感觉。从内容上看整部电影都带头极强的讽刺性,不管是新式的性爱或者是食塑者的设定。不喜欢的点在于感觉到想深度的探讨一些话题,但画面却一直在搞“花活儿”,有种形式大于内容的感觉。其实更沉在画面冲击上可能效果更好。

  • 璟梅 0小时前 :

    知觉丧失,身体成为可以被任意蹂躏的异化物。打开的身体才值得被观看,器官的独异代替了内在精神。塑料人也是可致死的,解剖尸体却可以比切开活人更加惊世骇俗。于是,身体作为一种包装囚禁了我们,只有在其最无所谓效用的状况下才能获得自由。

  • 进夏柳 7小时前 :

    听不懂,看不懂,

  • 莉楠 5小时前 :

    整部电影唯一让我沉迷的只有蕾老师的美好肉体,it's confirmed that I'm old sex.(㊗️蕾老师生日快乐~)

  • 辰澄 2小时前 :

    A desire to be open(想到看性谎言录像带时的那种想被割开的欲望

  • 百里明煦 6小时前 :

    虽然有Viggo但这个类型不太合我口味……即便知道柯南伯格就是这种画风,也觉得过去看过的都比这部好。这个电影最大的问题是仅仅讲述了一个概念,令人感觉只需要一个短片就可以说清楚……另外,实在无法理解摇来晃去的椅子……

  • 校娜娜 4小时前 :

    看不懂但大受震撼系列。原本看到“大卫·柯南伯格·新器官·切割·行为艺术”等字样时兴奋不已,以为将是一场充满动感·重口味的视觉之旅,可观看时昏昏欲睡是怎么回事?镜头简洁克制极少拍越肩关系视听冷静到“无聊”是怎么回事?是刻意反漫威的实验探索吗?不懂·懵逼…直到看到豆友们的影评才知道自己多么肤浅,智商不够不要紧,别看不懂就骂,还是要多加学习才行啊!#说了什么又什么没说的影评啊#

  • 邹金玉 2小时前 :

    【4.5+】柯南伯格最佳。从一个世界链接向另一个世界,外向的陌异和内化的身体装置得到了惊人的平衡和丰富,不再(如20世纪时)只拘泥于概念化的建构,其在片中被观看后共享,乃至传递向影片的观看者。而每个全新却无意义的组织器官,如块块碎片建筑最后那雄壮而诗意的尾音,我们终于体悟到这是一场混沌的盛宴。

  • 琴静槐 1小时前 :

    kinky……你这让我说什么好,还是袁老说的:吃得太饱。1080P 22/06/21

  • 歧绣文 5小时前 :

    9/10。不出所料,年度十佳。实质上的第一部柯能堡。

  • 诚震 0小时前 :

    看的一脸懵逼,这玩意的冲击力对医生来说太低了。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved