Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
被名字和画面吸引进来，故事蛮喜欢的，故事脉络要是更清晰一些就好了，人物线条也可以更连贯一些。很多镜头特别美（例如天台谈心那里，两个演员依偎在一起，情感交流镜头在长一些就好了，看的时候感觉刚进入情绪，镜头就以正反打结束了，就觉得我的情绪都断了）但有些镜头都没什么内容，有点无聊，以及枪战追逐戏好像和本片无甚关系，感觉有些冗余。
逻辑bug挺多的，但是画面是好看的，剧情反转都在意料之中，达不到悬疑片的高度，就是剧情片。6分
画面氛围很好，剧情不算复杂，稍微有一个bug就是开头严华被烧毁的脸，竟然被画出来了，有些夸张，然后比如主任调戏严华故事线没有交待后续，队长与画像师互动感不强等，让剧情缺乏串联，到总体上来说真的不错，给四星！
其实拍得挺文艺的，但节奏太慢了。剪去30分钟毫不影响。剧本不太出色。
电影整体来说非常不错。
画面很有质感，逻辑上确实bug太多，但作为网大电影，值得鼓励，多给一星
感觉导演想把这部电影做得文艺又有剧情反转，但说真的，真的没做好，一个大框架没有什么内核，说教性台词很多，人物都很标签化，并没有深入人心。摄影挺好的，这两颗星都给摄影。
镜头很漂亮，特别是跳舞的镜头，故事相对简单。
肯定有瑕疵，有说不通的地方，节奏过淡，但是也是一部难得的过得去的国产片。但是因为bug让人后面觉得反转的不够自然，硬反转。加一星鼓励，鼓励导演编剧和演员们。鼓励认真的人。
意外发现的电影竟然有意外的惊喜，和石黑一雄原著小说内容无关但形而上的哲学思辨让电影内核饱满且与书有异曲同工之妙，摄影在细节上的处理也很微妙，可惜导演双管齐下的叙事策略似乎并不太能吸引人，剧作上有些冗长包括一些情节无法自圆其说，精心挑选的时代背景也没有起到太大的作用
光影色彩和服化道打造出的年代感十足，芦苇荡练习和最后的舞台独舞拍得很美，几场空境也如倪云林的水墨一般诗意。BUG的确不少，还有许多尬味说教台词，但瑕不掩瑜，你把它当文艺片而不是悬疑片看，也许会更容易入戏些。
氛围感节奏感都很棒，剧情其实也可以，可惜底牌太明.
影片故事有漏洞，画像的事也很假。不过对90年代的细节还原不错，好看程度也可以。总体三星半
逻辑是比较弱的。有一种理想化了的自圆其说之感。可是，穷尽自己的一生去接近梦想，这本身，既是一种悲壮的挣扎，也是一种涅槃式的自我救赎。
除了远处的山，飘着的云烟，似乎和远山淡影没什么关系。警察瞧不上画像师、暴躁有能力的老刑警、身份互换式的存亡与复仇，都算是老梗，说不上好，但也不能说它坏。
感觉导演想把这部电影做得文艺又有剧情反转，但说真的，真的没做好，一个大框架没有什么内核，说教性台词很多，人物都很标签化，并没有深入人心。摄影挺好的，这两颗星都给摄影。
画面4星
取景，空镜，色调，视觉语言都让人舒服，导演&摄影有点东西，缺点在于剧情弱且细节少。知青，舞者，文工团...泛黄的岁月的灰尘，永远戳心的题材。我来了，时代却走了。
电影本身，拍摄很棒，故事一般（最大的悬疑点应该是队长这个处事风格和能力，怎么做到队长这个位置的，只会大吼大叫，尽管癌症，但也不至于这么折腾一个“无关紧要的“男主吧）。 说拍摄的好是因为场景逼真，那个时代小镇的故事，总是让人有一种舒服（无忧无虑，单纯朴实）但又不舒服（物是人非）的感觉。
年代感处理的很舒适 叙事略微松散 悬疑的节奏不够紧凑
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
